Donald Trump hit with fresh indictment in 2020 election interference case

US

A new indictment has been filed against Donald Trump over his efforts to undo the 2020 presidential election following his defeat to Joe Biden.

The new document removes a section that had accused Mr Trump of trying to use the law enforcement powers of the Justice Department to overturn his election loss.

This was an area of conduct for which the Supreme Court ruled that he was absolutely immune from prosecution.

Last month’s ruling said former presidents are presumptively immune from prosecution for official White House acts.

The new indictment was filed three days ahead of a deadline for special counsel Jack Smith’s office to tell the judge in the case how they wanted to proceed in light of that opinion.

The special counsel’s office said the updated indictment, filed in federal court in Washington, was issued by a grand jury that had not previously heard evidence in the case.

Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks from a bulletproof glass housing during a campaign rally, at the North Carolina Aviation Museum & Hall of Fame in Asheboro, North Carolina, U.S. August 21, 2024. REUTERS/Jonathan Drake
Image:
Donald Trump during a campaign rally in North Carolina. Pic: Reuters

The original indictment included allegations that Mr Trump tried to enlist the Justice Department in his failed effort to undo his election loss.

More on Donald Trump

This included by conducting sham investigations and telling states – incorrectly – that significant fraud had been detected.

Read more US election news:
Deep divisions ahead of 2024 presidential election
‘Do something!’ Michelle Obama tells DNC
Sky News reveals coverage plans as America prepares to pick a new president

It detailed how Jeffrey Clark, a top official in the Trump Justice Department, sought to send a letter to elected officials in certain states falsely claiming that the department had “identified significant concerns that may have impacted the outcome of the election” and had asked top department officials to sign it, but they refused.

Mr Clark’s support for Trump’s election fraud claims led the then president to openly contemplate naming him as acting attorney general in place of Jeffrey Rosen.

Mr Trump ultimately relented in his plan to replace Mr Rosen with Mr Clark “when he was told it would result in mass resignations at the Justice Department”, according to the original indictment.

Articles You May Like

Nvidia shares take fresh hit as growth expectations disappoint
Trump picks TV’s Dr Oz to lead Medicare and Medicaid
Google could be forced to sell its Chrome browser over internet search monopoly claims
What to know about the significant changes to PGA Tour eligibility
Kia is slowing EV9 output in the US despite a hot sales start: Here’s why